Comprehensive Planning as a Tool for Compatibility

Compatibility is not a new comprehensive planning concept, nor one limited to supporting mission readiness for military installations. For generations, comprehensive plans have addressed the compatibility of different land uses to promote public health and safety, conserve resources, develop infrastructure efficiently, and promote economic growth. These considerations are often reflected in implementing ordinances and plan policies that guide decision making. Heavy industrial and residential uses are traditionally separated due to incompatibility, prime agricultural land and sensitive natural areas/habitats are protected from encroaching development that may threaten them, and capital investments are directed toward those areas in which a jurisdiction desires physical growth and economic development.

Comprehensive plans can and should consider the compatibility needs of military jurisdictions, just as they consider the natural and human made resources and land uses one typically associates with comprehensive plans. Maryland state law dictates that certain elements be included in all comprehensive plans, based on the type (e.g., Charter Counties, Municipalities) and location (e.g. tidal waters) of each jurisdiction. “Elements” are synonymous with planning areas, and include topics such as transportation, housing, land use, and water resources, among others. For each required element, Maryland law prescribes the necessary components, but does not preclude a jurisdiction from including additional planning aspects that it deems necessary for the element to rise to the challenges of the community. For example, § 3-105 of the Land Use Article requires that a transportation element “provide for bicycle and pedestrian access and travelways”, never mentioning newer forms of shared mobility (scooters) nor sustainable carbon emission reduction strategies (electric vehicle charging stations). Jurisdictions, however, are free to analyze transportation modes and strategies not explicitly mentioned in the Land Use Article and address them in their transportation elements. In the same vein, while the Land Use Article does not require a military element in comprehensive plans, it does not prevent the inclusion of one either. In fact, a military element is an excellent way to advance the 12 Planning Visions.

A standalone military element is not the only way to incorporate compatible use planning into a comprehensive plan either. The table below lists many of Maryland's required planning elements and suggestions for how they could address compatible use. For each one, the suggestions assume that the installation is included as a stakeholder in the plan development process. The name of each element is linked to its respective Maryland State Code description for non-charter counties and municipalities.

MD Comprehensive Plan Elements and Compatible Use

Comprehensive Plan Element
​​Co​mpatible Use Inclusion
  • Analysis of the community facilities needed to support installation military service personnel, civilian ​and contractor workforce and their families. This should be based on anticipated population growth, ages, family sizes, and feedback from the installation and other stakeholders
  • Location and spatial distribution of community facilities considering base location and where service personnel, civilian and contractor workforce and their families live
  • Policies requiring the consideration of installation needs in the development, design, maintenance, and siting of community facilities, including membership of military representatives on community facilities advisory boards
  • Strategies to develop, strengthen, or maintain intergovernmental support agreements (IGSAs) between the local government and a military installation for community services such as fire, police, solid waste management, etc.
  • Analysis of the affordable housing needs of installation service personnel and their families. This should be based on anticipated population growth, household income, family sizes, and feedback from the installation and other stakeholders
  • Service personnel are often included in the discussion of workforce housing, which the Land Use Article defines as between 60% and 120% of Area Median Income. The Housing element could include policies and objectives designed to provide housing that is affordable for installation personnel
  • Partnerships with the installation and housing organizations to develop and maintain affordable and decent housing for military personnel and other community members, including leveraged funding
  • See Planning's Housing Element Models & Guidelines for resources devoted to housing elements.
  • Analysis of the types and intensity of land use, including on the ground development and zoning, adjacent to military installations and its compatibility with the installation's mission, considering the 24 compatibility factors
  • Designing and designating growth policy areas so they avoid areas in which the installation does not want growth
  • Designating areas as open space and agricultural land use to avoid development encroachment issues with military installations
  • Developing land preservation (e.g. easements) and growth management (e.g. water and sewer infrastructure, subdivision of large agricultural parcels) policies and strategies to avoid development encroachment issues with military installations
  • Analysis of population growth and greenfield and/or agricultural land consumption trends over the past few decades and their spatial relationship to areas of concern for military installations
  • Strategies to seek funding for and complete compatible use planning efforts, such as an Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Study or Compatible Use Study (CUS)
  • See the Compatibility Mapping Tool for spatial information, including military influence areas and state designations
  • Flexible development regulations (e.g. clustering, transferable development rights) that can accommodate growth and density where appropriate while also diverting development from those areas that may encroach upon a military installation
  • Strategies promoting economic development supportive of a military installation, and which leverage the resources of DoD funding in the community. See the Velocity Center case study for an example
  • Streamlined review of and/or incentives for land development applications situated outside of an area of concern for a military installation, or which are situated inside an area that the installation recommends for growth
  • Policies promoting the submission of land development applications to military installations for referral
  • See Planning's Placing Jobs for resources devoted to economic development planning
  • Coordination with a military installation to establish and identify sensitive areas on which development should be limited or restricted to avoid encroachment. These areas could be mapped
  • Promoting the use of preservation funding sources, such as the Rural Legacy, Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation (MALPF), Program Open Space (POS), and REPI programs
  • Three-way partnerships with local or regional land trusts, a military installation, and the local government
  • Planning for resilience that supports the military mission and protects community resources, property, and public safety. Please see the Military Installation Resilience Review Process summary for more information on how communities and installations can partner on resiliency planning.
  • See Planning's Land Preservation Dashboard for more information on the current status of Maryland's land preservation efforts and to access the tabular data that informs the dashboard as well as available land preservation GIS data
  • Develop patterns and schedules for transportation facilities that support the ingress and egress needs of a military installation and account for the volume of travelers and freight coming to and from the facility
  • Policies supporting Transit Oriented Development in areas in which a military installation supports growth, and which could attract installation personnel, military, and other representatives to live and recreate
  • Strategies requiring the engagement of a military installation in the Consolidated Transportation Plan and Priority Funding Letter processes.
  • See Planning's Transportation Element Checklist for more resources that may be used in the completion of a transportation element
  • Coordination with a military installation on the adequacy of drinking water and wastewater systems, including the establishment of regular meetings between government and installation representatives on water and sewer service demands, capacity, and infrastructure needs
  • Monitoring withdrawal and discharge allocations and permits to ensure that the needs of the installation and community are not interfering with those of the other, and that reciprocal arrangements can be established for providing back-up supply
  • Coordination on the development of a county water and sewerage plan, which is an implementation measure of, and must be consistent with, a comprehensive plan, per § 9-511 of the Environment Article.
  • Strategies to leverage local, state, and federal funding resources for the expansion, enhancement, and maintenance of water and sewer infrastructure supporting the facility and community
  • See Planning's Water Resources Element (WRE) Guidance for more information and resources about the WRE.
  • Mapping municipal growth areas, or those properties proposed for potential annexation, to avoid areas in which a military installation wishes to avoid encroachment
  • Designing rural buffers or greenbelts to correspond with areas that an installation would prefer lower density/intensity and/or open space
  • Analysis and population projections accounting for any growth expected from a change in military installation mission or increase in personnel
  • Strategies for coordinating with installations the extension of services, and the financing thereof, to annexation areas
  • Infill policies and strategies that accommodate growth within municipal boundaries and away from greenfield areas that may encroach upon a military installation